Rising Demand For Knowledge Requires A Key Profiling2018.11.03. // News
coretelligence looks in the reports produced from analysis systems a logical next step is too little commercial value for decisions key figures profiling Bad Oeynhausen/11.08.2010 after the establishment of the analysis systems – key figures profiling represents an evolutionary development of the now widely used analysis systems according to the business consultancy coretelligence. They had arisen since the early of 1990s in response to the growing needs of companies for more sophisticated decisions and were since then technically continuously differentiated. The dissemination of analysis systems was an important development phase, because the company no longer alone ensure control settled due to their increasingly complex conditions with General assessments, experience and gut feeling”, judge coretelligence Managing Director Marianne Wilmsmeier. However it would be a dangerous miscalculation in their eyes to believe that already sufficiently secure decision reason store created with this technical support would. You problematized, that are today with much effort a lot of economically relevant facts analysed and presented their results in ever larger reports. But the actual commercial value of the calculated metrics is often still far below its potential. Because no endless columns of data in the reports help the decision makers generally, because naked figures are usually only a low significance “, Wang stressed. When there was practically no systematic instruments as decision AIDS, this now established analytical systems were of course.
a blessing” But now the knowledge needs of managers in the company has evolved, why the investigation alone is not enough numbers. Recently, a survey by coretelligence found that about half of the business executives with the existing scorecard is dissatisfied. Background of critical opinions is especially the considers to abstract expressiveness of the figures. In addition, they reflect the for a majority Surveyed to isolated considerations against and no sufficient insight into the condition conditions between different situations. As a consequence, 58 percent complain that too few decisions can be derived from the analyzed figures and similar to many there is a high risk of wrong decisions.