My China Star

While we continue in linear readings only blossom humor that hides, the conclusions of the impossibility and the vision of power from an outdated angle. According to cajoo, who has experience with these questions. I understand that breaking a paradigm is in itself very difficult. I understand that teaching you to think a country is no easy task, but the bubbles that envelop a Republic sometimes are fragile and can pierce with the repeated word. The uselessness of the old paradigms is illustrated when the man begins to suspect that no longer serve him successfully to the solution of the conflict or problems. It is clear that the revocation of the above requires a sustained effort because data and assumptions should reassess.

The possibility passes through the creation of joints, i.e., through deployment of the society subject to a process of imagination that change meanings thus producing alteration that may lead to a change sociohistorical (action). Behold, the need for a new language, the creation of new paradigms that continue through the social and the psyche. We assume, necessarily, the conviction of things as they are not working and should be replaced (psyche) and this other kind of sense must offer. The (social) second is to note that the person can achieve this without one explicit power (mass control, a party, or any other institutions that have traditionally been depositaries of power). We must suggest an alteration of the established procedural. It is producing a shift from passive acceptance toward a field of replacement creation.

The appearance of a person with his conception of being in politics, one that decides to do and instituting required. The matter is that tame to the Venezuelan Chavez’s Government – is not possible. The correct approach is induce that human life is not repetition, and many less than political enclaves, and find a new meaning back in reflection and deliberation. We are not talking about a sudden revelation, but the creation of a new social imagery. Thus, without fill with ideas and thinking about the future ahead will not be possible change what exists. This Venezuelan Government casts doubt on all the days its reason for being and this is condition at our disposal to build the new paradigm. The possibility of instituting is hidden in the collective anonymous. In this way should forget classical terminology. The maximum value is not a constituent. It is an instituent power, that does not mean that does not institutionalize the instituent, to then be questioned by the new emersion of the instituent. Democracy is therefore continuous change. All process of this type takes place is obvious – in a specific historical circumstance. In ours, in the Venezuelans of today, not we can fear uncertain future democracy of the 21st century that I see is, then, a permanent updating. Current Venezuelan society is in negative phase. The protest is a simple loss of patience and the reading of columnists who insult the Government a simple exercise in catharsis.